StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Psychological Contracts in Organizations - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The writer of this paper highlights that the business world today is more dynamic than it has ever been in recent history. Companies must adapt to change, or they are forced to adapt by external influences. If they do not respond to the demand for change they can find themselves out of business…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Psychological Contracts in Organizations
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Psychological Contracts in Organizations"

Psychological Contracts Background Information The business world today is more dynamic than it has ever been in recent history. Companies must adapt to change, or they are forced to adapt by external influences. If they do not respond to the demand for change they can find themselves out of business. While change is often beneficial for the business it can impact the psychological contract which the company has with its employees in a negative manner and that can lead to certain problems. I was placed in such a situation during my part time employment with Company X which had gone under a recent take over from Company A. After knowing about the psychological contract and understanding its effect on part-time as well as the permanent employees of a company, I feel that I am in a better position to apply the concept usefully and to study the implications of a negative turn on the psychological contract. The learning from the notes and research on psychological contracts also allows to me to suggest ways in how a negative impact can be avoided or minimized. Introduction The central point which I came to notice about the two companies was that the cultures of the two organisations are vastly different. Company X was a traditional, bureaucratic and hierarchical company while Company A worked on the lines of a modern, fast moving firm. From the research on the topic, it can be seen that this fact alone is likely to lead to a culture clash (Hendry and Jenkins, 1997). However, the situation was somewhat worsened by the fact that the owners of the new firm decided to create a talent and leadership programme and sought employees who worked with the former Company X to join the programme and lead the business into the future. While the takeover itself certainly impacted the psychological contract, since as suggested by Garrow (2003), a mergers or an acquisition is one of the toughest storm a psychological contract has to go through. However, the process of identifying and selecting candidates for the new programme had an even bigger impact. Even before the process began there were four categories of employees, who were expected to show an impact the eventual selection results, i.e.: Employees who wanted to and were selected. Employees who expected and wished to join the programme but were not selected. Employees who were neutral about being in the programme but were eventually selected. Employees who neither wished nor wanted to join the programme but were selected. Robinson and Rousseau (1994) suggest that the psychological contract in all of the cases given above would be impacted differently and this was certainly shown to be true. As per the meaning of the term, psychological contract, it is the implicit contract of understandings between the organisation and the workers as they relate to both the expectations of the employees and the obligations of the employer (Emott, 2006). When employees are being selected for the leadership programme the psychological contract is bound to be affected in some way. Guest (2004) takes an even wider view of the contract in such situations where new bonds are being formed and firmly recommends that the full understanding of the psychological contract should incorporate fairness to both parties and mutual trust. This was difficult to achieve in this case because the takeover was still fresh and managers and employees from both the companies had little time to create implicit bonds. As Hendry and Jenkins (1997) suggest, since the contract is implicit, it is difficult to judge how it will be impacted with changes in the company, but at the same time it is important to consider the psychological contract before any change is announced to the workers. Impact on the Psychological Contract The first case of employees who wanted to and have been selected is easy to explain in terms of the psychological contract. For some reason, they considered themselves capable and deserving enough to be made a part of the talent and leadership programme and the company thought the same therefore there is no conflict between them. It does not come as a surprise to the employee; rather it comes as a reward or even as expected entitlement. This situation would validate the belief of the employee in his/her own abilities as well as improve the strength of the psychological contract (Rousseau, 1995). Guest (2004) mentions issues of power, trust and fairness as the central forces in making the psychological contract and all these issues reflect positively in this situation. The company displayed its trust in the employee; the employee expected the trust to be shown and that employee can be further expected to act at a higher performance level than before. The employee can be expected to show a greater amount of commitment to the company, be more satisfied with the new position and have a stronger intention of staying on with the company despite all the changes which were coming. However, there is one case in which the psychological contract might be affected negatively i.e. if the employee considers inclusion in the program to be only a reward for their previous performance and does not consider the additional responsibility placed on them as a part of the future management team. In such a case, if the person managing the program is responsible then s/he would follow the recommendations of Farrel (2003) and clarify the demands of the talent and leadership programme so the employees know exactly what is involved in the process. Similarly, a sense of entitlement should be replaced with a sense of responsibility since these employees can be expected to take future leadership positions at the locations where the company operates. The second set of employees, who expected and wished to join the programme but were not selected is the most difficult to deal with in terms of psychological contracts. Essentially they may look at their not being named as a breach of the contract and could also see the situation as being unfair. Fairness itself has been reported as an input, a result and an element of the psychological process by Guest (2004) and if this group of employees was not shown (either privately or publicly) why they were not selected while others in their place were, they may not have seen the process as being fair. Of course the issue may even be connected with these employees going as far as thinking that the company was making decisions based on preferential favouritism rather than performance feedback in which case this would certainly have negative consequences (Guest, 2004). It must be noted that such perceptions can come with a strongly negative emotional response which must be carefully handled by the managers. The emotional response and the feelings of the ‘rejected’ employee probably had little to do with practicality, objective reality or their actual standing in the company (Barnett et. al. 2004). It is also suggested that such employees’ measures for job satisfaction, commitment to the organization, perceived obligations to the company and their decision to remain with the firm will all suffer a negative impact (Guest, 2004). In a worse case scenario, the impact of a break in the psychological contract could be so severe that an employee can lose their motivation enough to reduce their input and contributions to the company. Barnett et. al. report that in the past, there have been (avoidable) situations where employees placed in similar circumstances have voted with their feet and left the company altogether. The third batch can be considered as those employees who were neutral about being in the programme but had been selected for the programme. This is one of the easier groups to deal with because their perception of what the organisation demands from them might change, but it is unlikely that the implicit contract was affected negatively. In fact, if the managers of the company could have a nice word with this group of employees and then enormous benefits could be gained from the improvement in the implicit contract. On the other hand, had the managers shown a lack of communication it could have led to cynicism and that must be avoided or it could turn into total apathy (Abraham, 2000). Since this group had no expectations to be included in the talent and leadership programme, it most likely came as a pleasant surprise and if the added responsibility could be coupled with other benefits, this group could produce many stars for the company in the coming years. From the manager’s side, going above and beyond the psychological contract is expected of nearly every good employee and the company which does the same would have plenty of rewards. The employees’ attitude in this case can be expected to show a higher level of commitment, improved motivation and they are likely to be more satisfied with their jobs (Garrow, 2003). The final case concerns employees who neither wished nor wanted to join the programme but were selected as a part of it. This again was a delicate situation since they might perceive the talent and leadership programme as a burden or as suggested by Hendry and Jenkins (1997), they may not be ready to change their psychological contracts. In this case, the value of the employee to the company becomes important because if the employee is valuable enough, they should be given the opportunity to bow out of inclusion in the programme. If done correctly, the value of the psychological contract would improve and the employee could be expected to show higher performance levels. In such situations, it is probably better if the company does not make joining this programme a compulsion since it would sit negatively with employees who do not wish to join it. For the employees that the company feels would provide immense value by joining this program it is up to the managers to make arrangements and provide suitable conditions which let them secure their position as future leaders in the company. Conclusion For all employees who were working at the company (full time or part time), the central consideration was the legitimacy of the decision which matters. An employee who feels that the psychological contract has been broken could be mollified and accept the company’s decision if they are convinced that the decision was legitimate and for the benefit of all concerned parties (Hau & Tung 2003). In many situations such as the ones presented above, it is not what is said to the employees, but how it is presented to them that can the day. With regard to employees who were selected in the program it should be clarified what is expected of them as well as what they shall be provided in order to maintain and strengthen their future psychological contracts with the company. I am proud to note that the company is doing well and it seems that the psychological contracts of the employees were not shaken or broken and the managers were able to control the negative effects of the changes taking place. I feel that the one management tool which was employed to the benefit of the company was communication since it saved the day for many managers and workers with the company. The takeover was certainly a significant event in the history of the company and I was certainly glad to be a part of the process since it gave me an insider perspective on how such things are bound to have a negative effect on the psychological contract. However, I also realised that with strong management abilities and excellent communication skills a manager can use such situations as an opportunity rather than threat. Word Count: 2,183 Works Cited Abraham, R. 2000, ‘Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences’, Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, vol. 126 no. 3, pp269-293. Barnett, R. et. al. 2004, ‘Unintended consequences of job redesign’, Community, Work & Family, vol. 7 no. 2, pp227-246. Emott, M. 2006, ‘A review of research into the making and breaking of psychological contracts’, People Management, vol. 12 no. 1, pp. 47-48. Farrel, C. 2003, ‘Employer branding: The attraction of talent and creation of an honest psychological contract’, Australian Journal of Psychology, vol. 55 no.1. pp 123-124. Garrow, V. 2003, ‘Pact to the future’, People Management, vol. 9 no. 25, pp26-30. Guest, D. 2004, ‘The Psychology of the Employment Relationship: An Analysis Based on the Psychological Contract’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol. 53 no. 4, pp541-555. Hau, V. W. and Tung, A. W. 2003, ‘The art of explaining organisational changes to employees: Reducing negative reactions through effective communication’, Australian Journal of Psychology, vol. 55 no.1. pp 128-129. Rousseau, D. 1995, Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage Publications Ltd., London. Hendry, C. and Jenkins, R. 1997, ‘Psychological contracts and new deals’ Human Resource Management Journal; vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 38-44. Robinson, S. and Rousseau, D. 1994, ‘Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 245-259. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Psychological Contracts in Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2171 words, n.d.)
Psychological Contracts in Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2171 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1538342-using-your-placementwork-experience-you-are-required-to-critically-analyse-the-nature-of-the-psychological-contract-within-the-workplace-and-use-2-3-other-the
(Psychological Contracts in Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2171 Words)
Psychological Contracts in Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2171 Words. https://studentshare.org/psychology/1538342-using-your-placementwork-experience-you-are-required-to-critically-analyse-the-nature-of-the-psychological-contract-within-the-workplace-and-use-2-3-other-the.
“Psychological Contracts in Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2171 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/psychology/1538342-using-your-placementwork-experience-you-are-required-to-critically-analyse-the-nature-of-the-psychological-contract-within-the-workplace-and-use-2-3-other-the.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Psychological Contracts in Organizations

Communication Mechanisms to Develop Understanding

Organisational Behaviour Assignment Based On Case Study Table of Contents Introduction 3 Implementation of psychological Contract in the Company Due to Negative Responses of the Staff 4 Existence of Motivational Gap among the Employees 6 Communication Mechanisms to Develop Understanding 9 Conclusions and Recommendations 13 References 14 Introduction Understanding organisational behaviour has become quite a crucial prospect to ensure overall business efficiency.... In this context, concepts of psychological contract, motivational gap and communication mechanisms will be taken into account in the discussion henceforth....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Analysis of Contract Law Cases

Any contract must have terms in it that bind the contractors after all from the definition of the term contract; it is an agreement between two or more persons that is intended to create legally binding obligations.... It is fundamental that the parties to the contract should mutually agree to the terms of the contract the courts shouldn't interfere with what the parties have negotiated upon. … A condition is a term of vital importance and goes to the root of the contracted....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The UK Commercial Law

The rule of estoppel is based on the principle of holding out and is not confined to contracts of employment only.... He can bring charges against Jerry since he had told him to pass by at a large animal feed supplier and order several bags of animal feeds for him.... Whilst he was at the animal feed supplier, Jerry saw a Land Rover for sale in good condition and agreed to purchase it on behalf of Tom....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

How useful is the psychological contract in managing staff in the police service

psychological contracts, involving assumed responsibilities, should be differentiated from expectations, which are common ideas believed by employees regarding what they will encounter in their employment relationship and the organisation (Calo 2006).... On the contrary, psychological contracts involve... Dissimilar to implicit or formal contracts, the psychological contract is innately affective or perceptual, and hence the interpretation of one individual of the agreement may not be shared by the other (Herriot 2001)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Organisations, People & Performance - HR Strategy for Easy Jet

Most businesses have core and non-core strategies.... The noncore strategies have to be aligned with the core strategies in order for… In this regard, having a proper HR strategy is paramount for a business to thrive.... According to Kim and Mauborgne (2013), human resource has become such an indispensable aspect of the business strategies that failing to have one is a big challenge for most businesses Modern human resource management has shifted and it has entered the core of business strategy....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Organisations and Transformations

nbsp; Company X has recently been acquired by Company A and the cultures of the two organizations are vastly different.... hellip; Communication can be expected to save the day here for Company X as it often does in so many cases where the psychological contract is involved.... The merger and the changes being brought about within the company are bound to have a negative effect on the psychological contract but a good manager with excellent communication skills can use this....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

An Exploration of Small Firm Psychological Contracts

Researchers and academics worldwide have extensively explored the value of psychological contracts in the context of contemporary organizations.... In order to understand the role of psychological contracts in contemporary organizations it would be necessary to refer primarily to the characteristics of the specific form of employment relationship; in accordance with Rousseau (1995, 90) the traditional form of psychological contract does not – any longer – exist; the above view of Rousseau is also supported by Conway and Briner (2005) who add that psychological contract can affect organizational environment mainly through its violation (Conway and Briner 2005, 15) which can have different on organizational environment – as explained in the empirical research presented below....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Influence of Employee Voice on Pay Determination

The article discusses the ways in which collective employee voice can enable individual level integrative negotiations in the jurisdiction of non-codified elements of employment conditions that he calls 'psychological contracts', quoting Denise Rousseau(1995).... However, to keep up with changing production and market requirements, organizations need to revise the boundaries of this zone periodically, with employee consent, if the organization has to survive....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us