StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Should the House of Lords be Abolished - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper tells that the House of Lords is a legacy of the Royalist system of government that has no place in a modern democracy. The primary reason for this is the nature of hereditary titles and the relation of a singular religion, the Church of England, within the structure of the Upper House…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Should the House of Lords be Abolished
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Should the House of Lords be Abolished"

The House of Lords, as it exists today in Great Britain, is a legacy of the Royalist system of government that has no place in a modern democracy. The primary reason for this is the nature of hereditary titles and the relation of a singular religion, the Church of England, within the structure of the Upper House. “The Lords Spiritual are made up of the Archbishops of Canterbury and of York, the Bishops of London, Durham and Winchester as well as specific bishops of the Church of England. The Lords Temporal are made up of hereditary Peers elected under Standing Orders, life Peers, Law Lords, the Earl Marshal and the Lord Great Chamberlain.” (UK Parliament, 2010) Modern democracy asserts the popular representation of values in government through elected officials as a structural characteristic. Most British people, on this basis, oppose the House of Lords as a political institution because of the power given to royalty and hereditary legacy within the body itself. As an Angus Reid poll in 2010 showed: “In the online survey of a representative sample of 2,004 adults, three-in-ten respondents (30%) believe the UK does not need a House of Lords, and want all legislation to be reviewed and authorized by the House of Commons. Two-in-five Britons (40%) think the UK needs a House of Lords, but want the people to be allowed to take part in the process to choose lords. Only nine per cent of respondents think the current guidelines that call for appointed lords should not be modified. Two-thirds of respondents (66%) support holding a nationwide referendum to decide the future of the House of Lords. A clear majority of Britons (58%) supports the notion of allowing the people to directly elect their lords. Conversely, only three-in-ten (30%) are in favour of abolishing the House of Lords altogether.” (Angus Reid, 2010) Thus, the British people are calling for reforms in which politicians and not royals would be elected to the House of Lords in a manner similar to the way the U.S. Senate functions in American democracy, including elections, term limits, and “checks & balances” between the upper & lower Houses of Parliament, rather than the total abolishment of the House of Lords. The House of Lords in fundamentally undemocratic, having been instituted as a means to limit the expression of the people’s will politically when it comes into conflict with the interests of the royals in society. In the 14th century, “two distinct houses emerged. One composed of shire and borough representatives became known as the Commons; the other of religious leaders (Lords Spiritual) and magnates (Lords Temporal) became known as the Upper House.” (UK Parliament, 2010) In the 21st century, the division between “commoners” and “lords” is a morally repugnant principle to all but most royals. The vast majority of the populace rejects any difference between men or women related to the stature of their birth, with the exception of recognizing the degree to which wealth and privilege are linked. Royalty requires faith, like religion, but it is a faith that has been lost by most British people in favor of secular humanism. In this context, the existence of the “Lords Spiritual” in the chamber is a further undemocratic and reactionary aspect that few people can find in accordance with modern principles of governance, including in their own personal morality. Therefore, on the basic principle of equality, through which modernity finds respect for all cultures and minorities, minority rule in the House of Lords is rejected. The hereditary peer has been gradually reformed out of participation in the House of Lords by a Parliament following the popular consent. In many ways, it is feared, were there not reform of this system, the people would be more vocal for its total abolishment. That other countries formerly under Royal rule have abandoned their archaic practices to history and changed to a modern system of representative government based on scientific, and not religious, ideas is evident around the world. Traditionally, anyone with a hereditary title under the system of Peerage would be able to sit in the House of Lords to decide legislation on matters of the country, making the body huge and unwieldy in practice. “The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of most hereditary peers to sit and vote in the Lords. 92 hereditary peers remain in the House until full reform.” (UK Parliament, 2010) As previously, nearly one thousand hereditary peers had the right to sit in the House of Lords, this was considered one of the largest reforms of the system in modern times, and was undertaken on through the administration of Prime Minister Tony Blair. Life Peers may be born without royal title, but are elevated through a process of consultation between the Queen and Prime Minister, so that exemplary and exceptional citizens can be “elevated” to the stature of royalty, and be given a title to serve in the upper House. More than even the House of Lords, it is this system of titles that are decreed by royalty to royalty, creating a self-serving and fundamentally corrupt system at its base. “Life peers are elevated to the peerage by the monarch in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister. Opposition party leaders can also nominate, via the Prime Minister. Life peers tend to be the 'great and the good' of the day and are characterised by their expertise and experience in their field, which may have been in politics as an MP. An Appointments Commission, charged with making independent nominations of so-called 'people's peers' also operates. It occasionally passes names to the Prime Minister for nomination.” (UK Politics, 2010) It is this process of nomination and confirmation of each other for their own benefit that the public rejects of the Peers, as well as the Lords denomination of the rest of society as commoners, Fundamentally, this is most important, for every citizen rankles at having his or her humanity, and its relation to other citizens, reduced or demeaned as “common” vs. “royal”. It is through the arrogance and elitism inherent in this position that royalty will eventually be abolished everywhere in favor of the democratic principles. The House of Lords and royalty represent the last vestiges of a type of corruption and racism that fails to value men as equal – this is self-evident. Yet, in this context it is telling that the people do not want the House of Lords abolished, but rather reformed. A reformed House of Lords would eliminate lifetime, hereditary Peerage and the system of titles to create an upper body of the Parliament that served all of society, rather than what is self-defined as the royal interest. It would eliminate the reserved seats for Spiritual Peers and replace them with elected representatives. “SUPPORT FOR THE royal family is steadily declining, although it still commands respect from significant, though ageing, sections of the population. In 1990, 75% thought Britain would be worse off without a monarch. In 2000 it was 44%. And an ICM poll in April 2001 showed that 34% believed Britain would be better off without a monarchy. A Mori poll for the royal household found that only one in four people believed the family was hard-working. One in ten considered them good value for money.” (Socialism Today, 2002) Thus, reform of the House of Lords or movements to abolish it are founded on the people’s view on monarchy in general. When support for the monarchy is low, and Lords are targeted as examples of corruption in governance, then MPs on the popular level can further their careers by appealing to this public sentiment during the elections. Lacking the will to change more pressing economic or geo-political parties, reform of the House of Lords can also mask and hide other issues in the greater democracy that need reform. Nevertheless, despite the modern public’s opinions concerning royalty, their patriotism conditions them to favor not the abolition of the House of Lords, but its reform into an elected body, to make it compatible with the sentiments of modern British democracy. Sources: Canseco, Mario (2010). Most Britons Want to Elect the Members of the House of Lords. Angus Reid Public Opinion. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: < http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/43375/most-britons-want-to-elect-the-members-of-the-house-of-lords/> House of Lords Guides (2006). Life Peers. Politics UK. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: < http://www.politics.co.uk/briefings-guides/political-guides/life-peers-$450897.htm> Lord Norton (2008). How many hereditary peers sit in Parliament? Life and Work in the House of Lords. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: Thain, Manny (2002). Monarchy in the UK. Socialism Today. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: UK Parliament (2010). Legislation affecting the House of Lords FAQs. Parliament UK. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: UK Parliament (2010). Lords Spiritual and Temporal. Parliament UK. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: UK Parliament (2010). HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. House of Lords Briefing. Date accessed Dec. 12th, 2010: Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Should the House of Lords be Abolished Assignment”, n.d.)
Should the House of Lords be Abolished Assignment. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1574393-should-the-house-of-lords-be-abolished
(Should the House of Lords Be Abolished Assignment)
Should the House of Lords Be Abolished Assignment. https://studentshare.org/politics/1574393-should-the-house-of-lords-be-abolished.
“Should the House of Lords Be Abolished Assignment”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1574393-should-the-house-of-lords-be-abolished.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Should the House of Lords be Abolished

The System of Courts in the UK

The main aim to establish the Supreme Court was to place a demarcation between the senior judges of the house of lords or Upper House of Parliament of United Kingdom so that the level of transparency between the Parliament and the Courts could be increased in order to emphasize the independence of the law in the state.... hellip; The Court assumed the jurisdiction of the Appellate Committee of the house of lords and the devolution jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is an independent institution that is presided over by twelve independently appointed judges called the Justices of the Supreme Court....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Criminal Law - Malice Aforethought

the house of lords held this in the case of R v Moloney 1985 (ac 905).... The trial convicted the defendant with oblique intent and he appealed to the house of lords after he was dismissed by the Court of Appeal.... The case was heard and approved by the house of lords in R v Cunningham 1981 2 All ER 863, 3WLR 263.... It was held that the judge should not have used an expansion explanation for the intent of the defendant and the murder conviction substituted for manslaughter....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Compare and Contrast American Slavery to British Slavery

Though the history of slavery is long and it remained institutionalized also however, later on it was abolished through laws.... Though both these countries are the developed countries but both these countries have a history of slavery and slave trade and it was legally abolished in 19th century.... Slavery in Britain Slavery in Britain is often less talked of and is find rare mention in the academic literature however; Britain was one of the few countries which abolished the slavery trade in 1807 despite the fact that slave trade was one of the profitable occupations in the country....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Importance of the 1911 Parliament Act

“On the whole, the Reform Bill of 1832 resulted in the transfer of political power from the landowning aristocrats to the middle class, and in the subordination of the house of lords to the popular will,” http://www.... house of lords had no desire to pass the bill that would decrease their influence and power.... house of Commons remained largely aristocratic, mainly because violence and expenses had been common during elections.... It abolished many so called rotten or pocket boroughs....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Options for Lords reform

The saving… As a result the house of lords, which started out almost on par with the House of Commons has seen its powers and privileges gradually being eroded with the last act being the removal of most of the hereditary peers in 1999. By this initiative there would be only a mere ninety-two hereditary Peers in the house of lords and that too by election from within the large number of old Hereditary Lords.... the house of lords would then be dominated by appointed Peers and the hereditary Peers a mere rump of their size in days gone by....
28 Pages (7000 words) Essay

House of Lords - How Its Position Has Changed during the Years

The rest of the House is filled by the Lords Temporal; of which the majority is of life peers chosen by the Monarch as advised by the Prime Minister, or are selected on the recommendation of the house of lords Appointments Commission.... During the supremacy of King Edward III, Edward II's successor, the Parliament was divided into two sections: the house of lords (comprising of the dignity and senior clergy) and the lower House of Commons (comprising of district legislature and the shire)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

House of Lords Reform

hellip; This essay analyzes that The Parliament Act of 1911 is cornerstone legislation in this context as the provisions within it had the potential to significantly alter the status quo with regard to the house of lords.... This essay will show how far reforms to the house of lords have materialized and what areas have remained stagnant in the century since the Act.... The Parliament Act of 1911 is cornerstone legislation in this context as the provisions within it had the potential to significantly alter the status quo with regard to the house of lords....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

The House of Lords in the United Kingdom

The focus of the paper "the house of lords in the United Kingdom" is on the United Kingdom's Upper Chamber of parliament.... hellip; A committee of experts could replace the house of lords.... The last option is removing the house of lords entirely from the British parliament.... Over the years, the years, there has been raging political debate as to whether to reform the house of lords or to leave it as it has been.... the house of lords can be considered from two major perspectives....
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us